Let me read it out again. This was the suggestion:
That any motion to sit in camera shall be subject to a debate where the mover, and one member from each of the other recognized parties, be given up to three minutes each to speak to the motion; and that the mover shall then be given up to one minute to respond.
It wasn't to stifle debate; it was so that we wouldn't end up using an hour to discuss whether we'd go in camera or not. I believe that's what this would achieve. It was adopted by PROC as well. You know how these things sometimes go, where we can end up debating for an hour, easily, on whether we'll go in camera or not.
By restricting the mover to three minutes and giving everyone three minutes to speak to the motion, the issue then technically would be dealt with within about 30 minutes, at the most. I think that was the intent. PROC adopted that in the 42nd Parliament.