I'll go first, and then Ms. Coumans.
I would say that the UN human rights bodies have repeatedly taken Canada to task over the impact of Canadian mining companies on indigenous peoples in other countries. If Canada were to report on that under the new legislation, I don't know if that would be anything new. I think what we're hoping for is that some of the recommendations that have come from those UN human rights bodies to actually take action and bring in stronger human rights frameworks in Canada to regulate that activity would be more significant than reporting under the new act.
To get back to the point around the foreign investment protection agreements that Canada is signing with other countries, these agreements often preclude governments from introducing more robust environmental or human rights standards and lock in legislation at the time of the agreement or when a mining contract is awarded. They really prevent governments, as Ms. Coumans alluded to, in Papua New Guinea and other countries from actually raising their own standards. This is highly problematic. I think Canada reviewing its foreign investment protection agreement template that we use again and again to entrench and strengthen corporate rights would be a significant step forward.