Thank you very much, Mr. Allen.
I'll just note in passing that it's interesting because it's that kind of institutional stability that's part and parcel of applications that all international nations make to join global compacts, global agreements, for example. It's even in things such as NATO applications. People are looking at a certain stability for certain member nations, and this contributes part and parcel to that good governance sort of model.
Let me ask you something very specific. I'm also a Muslim Canadian member of Parliament, and I've been quite taken by the Crimean Tatar situation because of what it represents in Ukraine, a minority group that has been the subject of aggression, including very recent aggression, on the part of Russia. We know there is an annexation, and that annexation has not been accepted by Canada or many other nations.
I ask this because of the connection potentially to inclusive trade, because I know what we've tried to do with things such as CUSMA and other agreements going forward—including women, indigenous voices and Black entrepreneurs.
Could you speculate about different ways in which we might be able to empower economically what has been a targeted minority in Ukraine, the Crimean Tatars who might be living in Kyiv or other parts of the country, for example? When we're dealing with CUFTA 2.0 and we're expanding it out to hitherto unrepresented businesses, how might we broach this idea of how the Crimean Tatar voice could come to the fore? In the same way we could be accentuating indigenous voices here in Canada, the Tatar voices and Tatar business perspectives might be accentuated on the Ukrainian side of the ledgers.
Could you explore that with us, please?