As I said in my presentation, with respect to section 264, it might be duplicating the way the code is already being used. Is it necessary to modify the code in such a way? With respect to a double definition of, say, computer or other devices, I think that's something that could be investigated further. We don't want to create a law that will create a double criminalization.
Certainly there have been concerns, in U.S. legislation particularly, where bills that are much more aggressive than this have been put forward. Particularly in Missouri, significant cyberbullying legislation was put forward after a tragic incident involving adults cyberbullying a child. Parts of that legislation were struck down last year because they were so broad and so wide.
I would encourage the committee to consider that. Again, I don't think this particular legislation is quite as broad as some of the examples we've seen in the U.S., but I think we still need to be mindful of that concern.