It seems to me that the judges in that decision actually rewrote section 43. Parliament didn't intervene. I think people who would be against the repeal of section 43 would say that it should be up to Parliament and not judges to write the law. It seems that the law has been rewritten by judges in a number of ways—I won't get into all of the aspects of the majority judgment—without Parliament having had a say.
Would you agree with that?