What I can say about that is that the principles of diversion have existed for many years in the Young Offenders Act, so discretion is already being used with young offenders.
As I've said since the beginning, when the crime is not a crime against the person, there should be more openness to alternatives.
In the case of substance use or narcotics possession, the police could, with the help of a social worker or joint team, decide not to tie up the courts with all these situations.
There could be the possibility of having joint teams to assess the situation, the individual's past and the objectives of certain programs to see whether remedial action can be used. I'm not completely opposed to that possibility.
The important thing is to be rational and to use a scale for the different situations. Indeed, it may be a public health problem, but limits also need to be set at some point. For someone who's using narcotics and who has a family, for example, the decision could have repercussions on the family.