The reasoning is the same as for the two previous amendments, BQ‑1 and BQ‑2. The idea is to maintain the mandatory minimum sentence to indicate the seriousness of the offence, while allowing judges to waive it in exceptional circumstances.
This is what I think is most appropriate, especially since we're talking about robbery with a firearm. I find it peculiar that we would decide to abolish the mandatory minimum in such circumstances. It's a pretty startling message that we would be sending to gangs and the general public. The RCMP expects us to get tough on these crimes and stop these shootings, not to lessen the seriousness of them or to allow the courts to waive heavy sentences in such cases.
We believe that the minimum sentence should be maintained, while allowing a judge to waive it in exceptional circumstances, which the judge would then have to explain.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.