With respect to law reform, we do support the idea that the commission should refer and participate in law reform projects. They are uniquely positioned to see the wide spectrum of wrongful conviction issues that come before them, and they're uniquely positioned to study and provide data and input with respect to those issues.
With respect to the referral of misconduct, this is something that came up in the consultation phase. We are of the view that there are plenty of ways in which misconduct can be reported. The commission doesn't need to be the avenue through which that occurs. It can be something that they raise within their decision-making process—that this is something that a particular group, or body, or regulator should consider. However, they don't have to be the actual source of the referral. There are plenty of other "watchdogs", if I could put it that way.