Another question I have is for Ms. Ritchie.
I see in the bill that there is a defence where you would claim that what you were doing was in the person's best interest. While I can see situations where that might be true—somebody has Alzheimer's disease or something and you have to take care of them and make sure they don't harm themselves—in fact, one characteristic of coercive control is that the perpetrator is telling somebody that they are doing this because it's in their best interest.
Could you tell me whether you think that this defence is appropriate as it is written?