I understand. My only concern, though, is that we've lost roughly $50 million from what we had before, whether it was wound down or was a lost year, and then on top of losing that $50 million from homes, we're losing the $500 million that was directed at low-income homes in a specific program, separate and apart from the other. So I'm asking why that program, specifically, was cut, as an adjunct, and why we don't have that money.
I don't care if it's included in one program. But if everything is going in one program, then you have to have an equivalent amount of funding. So if you add $50 million from the loss from the one and $500 million from the other, I mean, we're talking about being out a lot of money.