I don't know if they're pleased, but they support the legislation. They recognize it has to be done. The current amount is woefully inadequate.
You ask me why we don't put this on people's household insurance. In fairness, I don't think they should be required to carry the insurance for nuclear operators. They wouldn't be the ones liable if there were an incident. Obviously the nuclear operators that cause the incidents should be carrying the insurance, not the consumers.
I'm not sure if you're asking why we would impose these costs on the operator, why we wouldn't let the consumer pay.