The first question you raised was with respect to the GNEP. I can just say briefly, that's a principle: we are not going to accept other countries' spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste. We've stated that very clearly and emphatically, and that's the way it is.
But there are other advantages. Again, we haven't made a decision, but the global nuclear energy partnership was looking at the entire fuel cycle. How do we maximize the energy we extract from the uranium? How do we become a lot better at recycling the fuel? How do we ensure we minimize the non-proliferation issues with respect to the waste? It's important as a country that we all work together on these areas.
These are some of the stated principles of the global nuclear energy partnership. The government has not made a decision. There are five or six countries. But there are clearly some very positive initiatives that the global nuclear energy partnership is undertaking. We participated at the first meeting in Vienna as an observer.
On your second question, with respect to some of the changes at Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, no; in fact these were decisions made by the corporation without consultation with the department. But they are quite common. Through the years at AECL, they've restructured numerous times as they strive to make themselves more efficient. These are internal changes in the reporting structure of the corporation to make their own efficiency as they look at their product lines. They're all internal in the reporting structure within the corporation itself. These were internal decisions made by AECL without consultation with Natural Resources Canada.