No, sir.
My reference to “improbable” predated mid-April, in the sense that the mid-April tests were specifically designed to test a hypothesis that we could move the PCR coefficient closer to the acceptable range for which it could be licensed. Unfortunately, the results of that test showed absolutely no movement. It really was a situation in which we had mixed views within our own technical team. We had optimists, pessimists, and those from Missouri, but frankly, at the end of the test it was very clearly the view of all that we did not achieve the indications that would give us any confidence about licensability based on PCR.