I don't know if you can answer this one, but as has been noted repeatedly, in September 2005 AECL and its customers agreed to terminate their original agreement and replace it with a 40-year supply agreement dated February 22, 2006. Other testimony we've had here before the committee says there had been other technical problems, but they were beginning to realize about that time that they were having major problems with the positive power coefficient.
In your opinion—again, not from the engineering but from the Auditor General financial perspective—if you know you're having major technological problems with your core technology and you don't have a backup plan, is it good risk management policy to sign a 40-year agreement in that place at that time and that sort of situation?