There were a number of problems. As we said in here regarding the quality assurance program, we actually felt it was significant enough that we qualified it as a significant deficiency. Significant deficiency means that there is a weakness that's serious enough to affect the operations and success of the corporation.
That was one of the three significant deficiencies that were raised in 2002. It wasn't related only to the MAPLE. From what I read, the MAPLE was the most significant project, but it was the case more generally throughout the corporation.