To my knowledge, that was not the case. It was not a question of lack of funding, but rather, a technical issue that could not be resolved.
When we referred to funding related to the MAPLE, the company had estimated at the time of the special examination that it would take significantly more sums of money to continue the research and the development, although they certainly indicated to us at the time that they were quite confident they could resolve this but they would need that additional funding, given the delays that were being incurred. It was not obvious where that funding, combined with other funding that was required either for the development of the advanced CANDUs or for the installations at Chalk River, was going to be coming from. That's the issue we were pointing out, that they did have these strategic challenges and that they had to resolve the question of funding, because that was obviously going to hamper their ability to move forward in those three areas.