Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I want to pick up on those questions. As I was looking through my notes and running through the timeline, I noted that it was on May 15 that the problem really began to be observed at the NRU. It seems that fairly quickly steps were being taken. I mean that within literally hours or days, things were being moved. It was noted that May 23, about eight days later, was when AECL would essentially no longer be able to meet its scheduled production requirements for medical isotopes. I must say that compared with the chaotic nature of 2007, things seem to be running better this time.
My question is, why are things running better? We have the protocol; we have steps and communications taken. What specifically are we doing this time that we didn't do last time, and why is it working better? Could you elaborate? What has changed so much that it's made the situation more manageable?