The one thing we would say, and Meena may add to this, is that within hours, basically, of knowing that the NRU would be down for a prolonged period—initially it was indicated that it would be for more than one month—the information was posted on the AECL website with an explanation as to what was going on. Indeed, as this developed, as the leak materialized, the information was disclosed. As the situation progressed, there were a number of updates on the site, and within hours, as soon as it was determined that it would be at least one month, this was communicated to the medical community, and afterwards as well, through a protocol that ensures that AECL provides that information to both our department and to Health Canada.
It also provided information, as a reference point, that the supplies would be continuing during the week, because even when the reactor is down, they can still pull some rods out of the reactor and process the moly. That, of course, comes to an end after a period of roughly one week. So that period was set out. There was certainly a heads-up to the medical community that there would be difficulties ahead.
Then, as my colleague from Health Canada indicated, there were also measures in place in terms of contingency planning on the demand side, as well as rapid engagement with international partners on the supply side.