This is a nice question.
At SNC-Lavalin, we're involved in pretty much all fields of supply, including coal, wind, hydro, and nuclear. We strongly think it's good to have a balanced mix of energy that includes hydro, nuclear, coal, wind, and solar. Unfortunately, we don't think the percentages for wind and solar can be that high, due to the requirements for redundancy and the requirements to make sure hospitals stay on 24 hours a day, seven days a week. But we think in the years to come the systems will greatly improve. Wind will become more efficient, and so will solar power.
But then if we look at the natural resources in Canada, hydro is a big one. We need to continue developing hydro projects, expanding them, and making them more efficient.
Nuclear is a great mix. Ontario has 52%. It has low-cost electricity as well as a reliable system and a reliable grid.
In terms of coal, I wouldn't even stretch myself to say who's going to capture most of the CO2 as well as the sulphur components. Clean coal is another source we cannot dismiss in the future, just because we have so much coal in Canada. The price of electricity from coal is affordable; therefore, it has to be part of the mix.
To be a strong country, to be strong provinces, to have a strong economy, all of these sources of energy have to be blended, depending on the province, depending on the location. They provide what engineering companies, construction companies, and suppliers in Canada need to export internationally.
If we reduce one line of the business, if we reduce one scope of supply, we would become dependent on the future. And maybe that's one of the concerns of solar and wind. Their components come from overseas, which means that afterwards, even if we were to buy a lot of wind, if we were to install a lot of solar, we would never become a great exporter of wind or solar technology.