Thank you very much for your question.
We are taking 90% of the CO2 from Boundary Dam 3. We will be selling it to the oil industry, which will use it for enhanced oil recovery in a reservoir.
The reservoir is very similar to those of the Weyburn projects. We have an analog or a template or a case study. That project probably has been the most studied rock per CO2 injection in the world. What has come out of the Weyburn project, which I used to manage at one time, is that you can safely store CO2 in an oil reservoir. The reason for this is that if you have a reservoir that can trap oil and does not leak to the surface, it's going to trap CO2. With the core analysis, all the scientific data really validates that you can use CO2 for EOR, but you can also store the CO2 for thousands of years and it will not leak to the surface.
Now, the only caveat is that if there is a place where there is a problem, it is the actual oil wells that we ourselves have drilled.
I used to have an oil company. I never found much oil, so I'm very good at plugging oil wells. If you had a leak, and we could detect it in parts per million, you could just go in and fix that well. So there are remediation/mitigation processes that can make this a very safe process. And we can just go back to the Weyburn field and build on that case study. But that's where our CO2 will be going, into similar types of reservoirs.
And then if we need it, there's one other storage, which is below. We have three separate horizons below that that are deep, deep reservoirs that can handle and hold much more CO2. Right now we are putting other saline chemicals in from potash very safely. So Saskatchewan and Alberta have great analogs on which to base our safety.