Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I wish I had more time. A lot of questions have come up. I have some for you, Mr. Carruthers, and then some for Mr. Derrick.
It seems like a back-and-forth act. Those like Mr. Cullen and his followers say there is going to be a spill, with no evidence that there will be a spill in this particular project. They've been able to successfully fuel the anti-pipeline movement with statements like that, which I find a little disturbing. On the other hand, you rightly say that you cannot guarantee there won't be a spill. However, you have the technology to build a pipeline so that the physical structural integrity can go as far as it possibly can to ensure there won't be a spill. You also have the technology and the plan to put the pilot tugs in to guide the tankers in and out of the harbour, with one or two on each side--I can't remember exactly what the plan was--with a minuscule chance that anything could go astray. It's a challenge to go forward with a detailed plan, based on sound technology and sound engineering, for how you're going to do this pipeline exercise. Your battle is against the sky-is-falling type of message coming from the other side.
Can you take a couple of minutes? Can you briefly touch on the structural integrity of the actual pipeline itself and give us a brief refresher on how the tugs are going to play a role getting the tankers in and out of there?