How do you square these two facts? In one case it's six times what is recommended by the International Atomic Energy Association, yet you're saying that one could stand next to one of these radioactive boilers for at least a couple of hours and it wouldn't be much different from getting a chest X-ray. As a non-scientific person, I'm trying to understand how one reconciles those two ideas.
On March 10th, 2011. See this statement in context.