Okay.
One of the things we tried to understand from Mr. Hawthorne yesterday was whether this was economics at play, because one questions the hassle. Bruce is going through a bunch of hassle now, and it's in the news, and so on. He also said it was very expensive to transport. He gave the impression to this committee and to the press that this was a wash in terms of costs: he said it would cost Bruce the same to keep it on site as it would to transport it and send it across to Sweden, but he wasn't able to provide us with any documents showing that.
As a part owner, as somebody with equity in the project, have you seen any economic analysis saying what it costs to keep it and what it costs to ship it to Sweden and ship it back?