With respect to section 35, I represent the area that is both Haida and Taku, so I'm familiar with the court decision. I was at the Supreme Court that day. This is not a small thing in terms of consultation and accommodation. There is an obligation of the federal government, the crown, to talk to you, and to consult and to accommodate if there's any need for accommodation. That's not an aside; it's embedded in the Constitution. It has also been decided all the way to the Supreme Court.
It seems that the CNSC hasn't consulted with you. It has broken a constitutional agreement and obligation. I'm trying to understand how this can be so lightly dismissed as part of this whole process in law.