Yes.
At the end of the day, these projects aren't decided overnight. Generally in the past there have been regulatory dances for five, six, seven, or eight years before people actually get on the ground and get to work.
We know that has changed. We know that there are new rules inside the NEB for maximum review periods, and we support that kind of thing. We want to make sure the review is rigorous and we want to make sure the review is strong. We don't think a project needs to be reviewed by two different jurisdictions. Let's take the most rigorous application of it, take a look at it, and have a maximum review period.