I think in some sense, yes, we did pick a winner. But there are also a lot of things we've invested in along the way that haven't worked out. Just looking at one that has, and saying therefore government investment is always a good thing no matter what, is not necessarily true.
I would highlight on your point, though, it is important that government have the space to invest in things that don't turn out. It shouldn't be a question of every government cheque must be tied to a success story. If you do that, you're going to end up investing in things that we already know will work. You want government to take the risk in these cases of R and D that the market may not take because the risks are too high or just not quite compatible with a market.
So absolutely it's yes on that.