Under our current plan, we certainly will have the two trains, or it's 10 metric tonnes, equivalent to about 1.5 bcf of gas a day.
The first train is very much focused on Canadian offshore gas, taking the reserves that today are uncompetitive and moving into the United States, which was what used to be its natural market, then looking at developing the New Brunswick onshore, and particularly even maybe the Nova Scotia onshore once they get through their fracking issues.
The second train is very much focused on Marcellus production in the United States. As you already mentioned, that's all connected to the grid through the Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline, which currently runs from north to south. I think that when you talk about the reversal of infrastructure, here's a very good example of a pipeline that was designed to do that.
If you want to take that same scenario and move that to Europe, the pipeline systems aren't designed to go backwards and forwards. They're really very much designed to go in one direction, and just as we've seen here in Canada, to try to reverse flow—including the Enbridge's line 9, a few months ago—is physically difficult to do, but it's also sometimes not even technologically possible. In our scenario, one of the reasons why Goldboro was a very good place to start trying to build an LNG terminal was the fact that the pipeline itself was already designed to go in both directions, and so the reversal to bring gas from the United States into Canada, versus going in the other direction, was already a viable option and a relatively inexpensive one.