The one thing I would say—and it goes to the earlier point we raised—is that when you look at the programs in the clean-tech area—and we talked about energy efficiency and innovation—two things are happening. Those programs have a natural cycle to them. You see them being at one level for a number of years, and then toward the end they typically tail off a bit as they're going to sunset. So we're seeing that, actually, in a couple of those programs.
The second thing is that they're coming to the end of their sunsetting period. We're going to have to go through an evaluation, and the government will have to decide whether it wants to renew them. We don't know if it's going to be at a higher rate or a lower rate or the same rate.
What you're seeing right now, in this snapshot we have this year, are programs that are in place. They might be reducing spending, but that's the way they were designed so you see a little bit of that.
You also see that in out-years, and this goes to the question that was raised earlier. The funding can just drop off, if you look at the reports on plans and priorities. In fact, it might; they might be totally eliminated. But the more likely scenario is that they are renewed, perhaps in a modified form, at some level—either a bit lower, a bit higher, or the same.
Anyway, I just want to clarify that when we talk about the funding for clean energy programs and what the estimates are telling us, we just have to keep those two things in mind.
On the biofuels, yes, the money was returned to the consolidated revenue fund, and it finds its way into...wherever. It might go into research in one area; it might end up finding its way into the renewal of some of these clean energy programs. We don't have those decisions yet.