It's okay. I'm used to rapid fire from this particular member.
I can tell you there has been no compromise of the safety. I would turn his attention to a piece of legislation recently that appears to have had unanimous support at this point in time around pipeline safety, for example. I just reviewed earthquake monitoring. Pipeline safety legislation, and the resources required to support it, build on a record of 99.999% safety over more than 72,000 kilometres of federally regulated pipeline.
Obviously, what we're focused on first and foremost is safety and it will not be compromised. No resource project or infrastructure project required to support natural resources will be compromised in terms of safety. This would include the resources that cover the entire process of developing resources responsibly from the environmental assessment process itself and the National Energy Board's important work, to compliance for profound safety reasons around marine, rail, and pipelines that give and meet that public confidence test around safety prevention preparedness response and world-class liabilities, based on the polluter pays principle.