I think the short answer is no. The reason is that in order to put a regulation and a policy in place, one has to take time to be thoughtful about it first, because regulations can also kill business. We're talking about an innovation plan that is moving quickly.
In the particular case, you have the electrical department of the Ministry of Transportation saying that it really doesn't want to touch this because who knows whether solar is going to work?
Michael from Canadian Solar is flipping. I hope he's doing a little dance over there and saying, “What do you mean by, 'is solar going to work?'”
It's not just a regulatory thing that you can solve, because you can't force everything through. Somehow it has to be something that takes it over the line so that someone isn't going to get fired if he picks a solar project and it doesn't work. That's the issue, right? You were never fired for picking IBM and you never got fired for picking the grid or picking the technology that was proven 20 years ago. That's what we have to try to unlock. How do you de-risk it for that guy?
I have to say that “How do you de-risk it?” is the perfect question, because people want to do it if it's de-risked.
I'll go back to Mark's commentary. Private investors would like the due diligence, the checkup, the questions, the things that government investment brings. If you could just get the CPP to put a quarter of a per cent of its money in Canadian emerging technology—it doesn't do that now—to balance its portfolio.... I don't know how to do that. How do you get ahead of technology that's changing every five minutes, à la Uber?