I call this meeting back to order.
Mr. Beaulieu, the very thing I was afraid of has come to pass. This is exactly why I wanted to deal with your subamendments one by one. However, you told us that your document contained one single subamendment.
As I said earlier, everything relating to points one to four is admissible. However, your last section seems to include points concerning the clause-by-clause study, which is inadmissible according to our rules. If you really insist that your document is a single subamendment that can't be split up, I will have to deem the entire document inadmissible.
For the sake of fair play, I suggest that you submit your amendments about points one to four as written and forget about the rest. Otherwise, I'll have to reject the entire document. I'll let you decide how you want to proceed.