So you're saying that there was no way....
Was there any political interference to, say, avoid accountability? I think you were doing due diligence. You were going through a step-by-step process to say, here is a problem; somebody doesn't understand debt, or the difference between a debt and a liability, and how it affects the appropriation.
When you were seeking a legal opinion, were you in any way trying to avoid accountability? Was the minister involved? Was there any political interference there?