We are certainly pleased with the action plans that have been presented. As was mentioned, we did review the action plan of Public Works, and it does address our recommendations. I say that, of course, under reserve. We will eventually go back and re-audit this to make sure these things are being put in place.
On this particular question, though, it would be easy to say that all the clearances have to be in place before the work begins. But sometimes that isn't the reality. What we would expect in that case is that there would be a very detailed and complete risk mitigation plan, so it would be clear up front that if the clearances aren't all in place, yes, the project may start. But what information do those contractors not get access to? What other risk mitigation techniques would be used until the security clearances come through?
I think that would be the way to probably handle that kind of situation.