Thank you, Chair.
I think this is a really slippery slope. I think it sets a very bad precedent and is completely revisionist as well. New information and whatever light it sheds is completely irrelevant. These audits were done. They were a snapshot of a certain period of time and what was occurring in those departments in that period of time.
To introduce new information now is completely irrelevant. We don't allow it now when we have current audits and we talk about what the government agenda is and what the new policies are. We don't allow those to be inserted into reports for the very same reason. It's irrelevant to what was captured by the Auditor General at the time.
As well, the committee has time and money invested in these reports. We have to act on the reports as they stand. I would not be willing to entertain a new hearing, a new report, or a new anything, frankly. I don't think that's the purpose of what we're here to do.