There weren't any specific measures implemented in the way you describe them. We didn't, for instance, specifically give targets to reduce expense accounts and so forth. What we did depended on the responsibility of the managers and the effectiveness of our control processes. They were examined and audited on an ongoing basis, and they've proven to be efficient. So we can control and reduce expenses on an ongoing basis. Rather than imposing specific criteria on the company, my approach has always been to appeal to the responsibility of our managers to see to it that they manage the resources efficiently and that they do spend what is required, and if it's not required, don't spend it.
I know you are addressing a specific question with the number that Madam Fraser has mentioned, but let me say that in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 our financial performance was better than the budget that was allocated to us by government; we did not require the funding that was allocated to us.
I take this as a sign of our being responsible managers and using resources in a responsible manner.