Obviously, we've seen that some of these can be done much more quickly, as was indicated in the report. It's been done with a lot of the larger projects, as opposed to the smaller projects. But before I get to that, you really have to stress the fact that if a farmer in this country has any kind of a disaster, asking them to wait almost a year before there is any effective monetary response to that could, in essence, drive many of these families into bankruptcy. It could have tremendous implications for their ability to continue in the business in any fashion. I think it's a very important issue to look at.
As for the reporting that the department has been more efficient in processing and executing larger project claims than smaller ones, we know that the bulk of the projects were smaller ones. Why is that? Is it because of pressure from the media? A lot of the larger disasters are out there in the media. People are talking about them and are more attentive to what's happening with them than they are to a lot of smaller projects. What's the reason that a lot of these bigger projects would get pushed through the system and out the door much more quickly than the little guy who's waiting for disaster relief?