I don't know, to be honest with you. I know what I control. I don't know why it was decided not to report—data not available, quality of data, maybe. I think we have made progress in terms of exchange of information and data.
My sense is, as I mentioned before, developing national indicators is one thing. If you really want to be meaningful in your co-development process with first nations, ideally you would go to the regional level. That's where we think we're going to get success, and for us, that's where it's going to go. National will come from that, but I think in the past we potentially took too much of a top-down approach. This is what we think it is.
We asked first nations communities, as you said before, under-funded and without necessarily with the capacity to send the information. We set them up sometimes for not necessarily success.