Thank you, Madam Chair.
I'd like to come back to Mr. McGovern because I found your presentation very interesting. You kind of walked us through what was going on during those years in what we have learned is probably the biggest single horizontal initiative that our government has undertaken in conjunction with the American government. I did derive some comfort in your presentation.
I will come back to the paragraph when you say, “By the time the election was called in 2015, a large majority of the initiatives had either been completed or were on track.” Then you go on to talk about the two that were outstanding and how movement was being made subsequent to 2015, and that there is outstanding legislation.
We understand that. What we're talking about here.... I mean, it sounds like there's a level of satisfaction with how the security initiatives were completed. What is your take on the performance indicators that we're concerned about? I'm not sensing that we have a concern about how the money was spent or that the money was wasted, or any kind of impropriety there. Mostly, how do we measure security, and frankly, of most interest to me, the improvements to traveller and trade times?
We're all for security, but we also have to keep on with our daily affairs. What's your take on the performance indicators? What were you looking for?