Thank you so much.
There's a motion put forward. Again, I'm new to public accounts, so it is interesting to me that a motion was put forward by a Liberal member worried about taxpayers' money. It's interesting, to put it mildly, after we were just trying to get the RCMP to testify here—and the Liberals did not want that before committee—about an app that we know cost at least $60 million, but there's more. There is this motion “That the committee immediately conduct a study into the flagrant disregard for public funds exercised by Conservative Party of Canada member of Parliament”.
If this member is really serious here—because she said “talk the talk, walk the walk”—I hope we can add a couple of amendments, obviously, about the Prime Minister's $6,000-a-night stay in London, as well as his very extravagant trip to Jamaica, which cost taxpayers.... I'm not sure how much that was. However, if we're going to walk the walk and we're going to talk about being very mindful of taxpayers' money, I think we should add that into this study, and Tofino. Thank you so much to my NDP colleague here. I think that we should add a few things if we're going to do this, because I think that would only be fair if we're going to talk about spending taxpayers' money.
I think there's also a green slush fund, if we want to do that on taxpayers' money. There's that $4.5-billion mental health transfer that never happened, and then there was the money that was spent to reduce chronic homelessness, which hasn't been spent. Should we go on here, Chair, in terms of misuse of taxpayers' money?
Right now, we're spending more on servicing the debt in this country, because of the Prime Minister's mismanagement of taxpayers' money, than we are on health care. If the Liberal member is truly serious about this, that would be a really great thing, because I think, absolutely, that we as elected members of Parliament want to ensure that the money is accounted for and is being fiscally spent. There are a lot of things we can add to this motion, and I'm curious to see if the member opposite is open to that, if she really wants to walk the walk.
Obviously, let's throw in arrive scam because, again, $60 million—that's being low—is what is expected, when it was supposed to cost $80,000.