Thank you.
Okay, here is what I'm told. I can deal with this in one of two ways. If members are in agreement with this change on a UC, I can accept it and it will replace what is already on the table.
If, however, you want to debate it, Ms. Khalid is making two changes. The first, dealing with the CEO, addresses the subamendment. We'll deal with that first, and then we go back to the amendment to the motion. Then we will deal with the change to that second line, because that really is an amendment to the motion.
They're both in order. I just have to deal with them either all at once.... If MPs agree with this in UC, you probably agree that the motion would pass. Of course, we'd still have a vote on it. If you want to debate it, first it's the subamendment and then the amendment to the motion.