Thank you very much.
We've established that this goes far beyond the existing criminal investigation and that there were existing relationships, as you indicated, Auditor General, that could have provided a bias or leaning toward serious contractors. My colleagues have established that there was no value for money for Canadians here. An app that was supposed to cost $80,000 ended up costing $60 million. We see $60 million spent and $12.2 million potentially unrelated, even, to this application. We see 18% of invoices by contractors who did not provide supporting documentation and even work being completed without security clearances.
Regarding the contracting, Auditor General, when we look at all of this—all of these discrepancies, this incompetence and possible malfeasance—who is fundamentally responsible for the contracting? Who has the final say on overseeing contracting for the ArriveCAN app?