I'll spend a little time very quickly on the constitutional question that was raised on automatic inclusion, because that's one that I think is of legitimate concern.
As I say, my analogy is to a criminal record, but you could, for example, look at the gun registry. I know some here are not fans of the gun registry, but the gun registry has been upheld as valid under the criminal law competence of the federal government.
Well, you're dealing here with people who aren't criminals, who haven't committed any criminal act, and they're required to register themselves and property. That hasn't been tossed out. It's been upheld.
In a case like this, you're dealing with people who are criminals and have a criminal record. So the threshold, you'd think, would be a lot easier to cross here, so I'm not particularly concerned about the constitutionality when you put it in that context.