Thank you.
My time is just about up, but I want one last quick question about the election of the chair. The government has told us that there's no point in speeding it up and that it took the U.K. a long time to get there. I don't really think that argument holds much water. That is one of our amendments as well.
May we perhaps have your thoughts quickly on that? It does influence the report afterwards, because if the chair is answering to whoever appointed him, as opposed to the parliamentarians, I think that might cause a bit of conflict.