I can just respond to that before I return to my remarks, Chair.
The amendment is that we proceed to a particular order of business. It's a substantive motion, which means that members are able to debate it. It would seem to me to be not only related to the issue but to be the central issue to consider if the committee is to determine whether or not to proceed to a particular item of business. The central issue would be to consider the nature of the item of business that the committee would be proceeding to.
I will continue to make the case for why we should adopt the motion to proceed to that item of business by explaining the importance of the item of business to which I am proposing the committee proceed.
The motion is for us to resume consideration of my amendment to the report from the subcommittee, and that report from the subcommittee highlights, centrally, the issue of the Bernardo prison transfer.
Members will recall that back in the fall, Conservatives insisted that families of the victims of Paul Bernardo be heard on the issue of the prison transfer. There was a great deal of outrage in the wider community, but especially from those who had been most affected by these crimes, over the fact that Paul Bernardo was transferred to a medium security prison from a maximum security prison, and that there was no—