I think this is something that was raised in the previous panel as well. There's a sense that if you don't already have the funding, then you are ineligible for some of the allocations in the way that they're made.
My point there stands. If the college and community innovation program is ineligible to be considered as a part of the allocations, it doesn't matter how much they get within that college program; that program is ineligible, and therefore the institutions are never going to be able to get a leg-up.
Maybe I'd just circle back to a comment in the previous panel around this idea that allocations are made, things like the research support fund, that.... Again, CCIP is not considered eligible, so it continues to push aside the research that is happening there for these other allocations. One of our sector's big pushes is that you have to make us more universally eligible if you want to take advantage of the ability of the sector to translate what is happening in primary, investigator-led research into the market.
I think this is something that we hear more and more from government, but the point is that you can't overlook or somehow ring-fence the institutions off to the side and say, “Well, that's not really the same. That's not really eligible”, and then expect them to be maximizing their results.