I think it comes back to our need to have an Arctic strategy. Within that is where the science component comes in.
I think I've listened to every session for this study. We have amazing researchers in this country. I've learned so much just by listening. They've made massive contributions.
However, what I've also heard—and it's what I absolutely believe—is that while all of these people are doing all this amazing stuff, it's all over the place. We're not ever saying, “Here are the four goals we are going to do as Canada, and we'll be the best in the world at that” so that everything somehow feeds into that. The research, then, could be realized and acknowledged. It would come together and have strategic purpose. That's what I was saying. It's the intersection between new knowledge and applied science. We have the ability to take in all of what's going on and gear it towards a purpose. It's in the applied research that you have very obvious outcomes.
I think the bigger issue—