Thank you.
Some of the other testimony that struck me—which I think you've sort of slightly touched on this in your comments today—that the government's strategy on funding "Arctic research" has been focused on important research like climate change, but there's a much broader scope of research that funding should be directed to: economic development, governance, food security, mental health strategy, infrastructure or whatever. There's such a broad breadth.
Would you recommend—again, in the context of formal collaboration in the truest sense of the word—that the priorities for an Arctic research strategy be broadened to encapsulate the larger set of needs of Arctic peoples?