Just for context, proposed subsection 810.03(7) of the bill lists a certain number of optional conditions that a judge can impose on the defendant, in addition to any other reasonable condition.
The radius condition that's being proposed here in this amendment refers to the condition at proposed paragraph 810.03(7)(c) on page 3 of the bill, which currently requires the defendant “to refrain from going to any specified place, except in accordance with any specified conditions that the judge considers necessary”.
This motion would amend that paragraph to further prohibit the defendant from going “within a specified distance of [a] place”. The effect of the amendment would be to essentially allow the imposition of a radius around the intimate partner or child's home within which the defendant would be prohibited from entering. For example, the condition could be that the defendant not attend within 500 metres of the victim's home. The idea is really to prevent the defendant from, let's say, sitting in a car outside the victim's home. The defendant wouldn't be technically in breach, but it sort of gets back to that coercive, controlling behaviour.
That is the rationale or the effect of the amendment with respect to proposed paragraph 810.03(7)(c).
Would you like me to also explain proposed paragraph 810.03(7)(f)?