I would leave it as it stands, Madam Chair.
I understand all the explanations, which are full of common sense. However, a judge is bound to use good judgment and common sense too. A judge will be able to keep things in perspective.
Can we think of a situation these days where it might be useful to refrain from using all social media? It's hard to predict the unpredictable. Can we think of all the unimaginable situations where it isn't possible to use social media? I doubt it.
As a precaution, I'm inclined to leave it in. This gives the judge the option of not using it if doing so restricts the rights of someone looking for a job, for example.
I had another question, Madam Chair. I gather that, because we're changing lines 22, 23 and 26 of the bill, paragraphs (c) and (d) of amendment G‑6 are concordance changes.
I see that this is the case. Thank you.