Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I want to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Davidson as well for asking those questions. The whole purpose of this study is to look at how we can be more productive with respect to the testimony that we're receiving from the witnesses. We're fortunate today to have witnesses who have flown before, as well as from Transport Canada, which has been on this issue for quite some time. When the report is actually generated from the testimony that's received by the analysts, I'm sure that the minister is going to come back with his department and his team and with lots of recommendations on how we move forward.
Specific to Mr. Davidson's comments, I understand some of the situations he's finding himself in in his riding, especially as it relates to remediation and looking at doing site-specific risk assessments, and then working with the province as well with respect to assessments and finding out what those PPM levels are—those parts per million levels—and different options related to remediation, and also working with other partners such as the communities to achieve the same.
Getting a bit more granular on the assessments with the aerodrome, my first question is to Mr. Bijimine with respect to whether the committee would be expecting, in the response to the minister, further information as it relates to the aerodrome.